our products

D&Q Mining is a high-tech company integrating R&D, production and sales. It provides mature products and solutions such as crushers, sand making, milling equipment, mobile crushing stations, etc., for aggregate, mining and waste recycling.

stone crushing judgements

Stone Crushing Judgements, Jaw Crusher

Stone crushing judgements supreme court judgment for stone crusher nestech supreme court judgement for stone crusher in an important judgment the supreme court of india stated karnataka stone crusher supreme court judgement is manufactured from shanghai xuanshiit is the main supreme court judgement on stone crushers supreme court judgement on. Online Chat Himachal High Court Judgment On Stone

More

Silicosis Victims and the Importance of the Supreme Court

17/05/2016· Worker at a stone crushing factory. Credit: Debdatta Chakraborty, UCL News/Flickr CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Credit: Debdatta Chakraborty, UCL News/Flickr CC

More

SANDHU CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED v PETER

Shuma stone crusher was allegedly situated only 15 metres from some residential houses. By living in Elerai the D respondent must be presumed to have agreed to tolerate acts of his neighbours in carrying out their normal and reasonable activities. As far as we can see, Saccon was carrying out its normal activities in operating its stone crusher, and the respondent, in the circumstances, must

More

M.C Mehta v. Union Of India And Others Supreme Court

The said “crushing zone” has been set up with the object of rehabilitating the existing stone crushers who are being stopped from functioning as a result of our orders. We, therefore, direct the State of Haryana through the Director, Town and Country Planning Department, Haryana, Chandigarh, the Chief Administrator Faridabad Complex Administration, the Deputy Commissioner, Faridabad and

More

supreme court judgement for stone crusher

SC directive to High Court on stone crusher units. In an important judgment, the Supreme Court of India stated that the High Court should ask stone crusher units to avail effective alternative remedy before SUPREME COURT IMPOSES BAN ON STONE CRUSHERS IN Aug 08, 2006 · The Supreme Court in its judgement dated May 15, 1992 had imposed ban on operation of stone crusher

More

M/S. Sanjeev Stone Crushing Company v. State Of Haryana

18/11/2015· It is engaged in the business of crushing stone builders into stone grit and dust which is used as other construction material. Proceedings for the assessment year in question i.e 2004-05 were initiated as the case of the appellant was selected for scrutiny being stone crusher. The assessee was communicated notice in Form No. N-2. The appellant put in appearance and filed written submissions

More

SHERIFF APPEAL COURT [2020] SAC (CIV) 1 GLW-CA187-17

acquire a stone crusher. It hired one from the respondent by way of a hire purchase . 2 agreement. The appellant avers that the stone crusher was not of satisfactory quality in that it kept breaking down and even when operated was incapable of the volume of crushed stone the appellant had expected. It became aware that the crusher was not owned by the respondent, which the appellant regarded

More

Mohit Stone Crusher vs Phool Singh And Ors. on 7

Union of India 1992 S.C.C. 256 as also notification dated 18.12.1992 issued by the Government of Haryana came to the conclusion that installing of stone crusher was actionable nuisance and was otherwise in violation of the law laid down by Hon'ble Supreme Court as well as the judgment passed by this Court and accordingly restrained the petitioners from installing and running stone crusher.

More

CORAM: MUSSA, J.A., MUGASHA. J.A., And LILA, J.A

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 10th April, & 29th May,2019 LILA, 3.A.: The appellant's seizure from the respondent of a stone crusher no. 941011829800 which was allegedly bought by one Godwin Gabone in a public auction in execution of a court decree and later sold to the respondent formed the crux of the civil action in Civil Case No. 131 Of 2005 in the High Court. In that case, which was filed on 22nd

More

SANDHU CONSTRUCTION COMPANY LIMITED v PETER

Shuma stone crusher was allegedly situated only 15 metres from some residential houses. By living in Elerai the D respondent must be presumed to have agreed to tolerate acts of his neighbours in carrying out their normal and reasonable activities. As far as we can see, Saccon was carrying out its normal activities in operating its stone crusher, and the respondent, in the circumstances, must

More

Silicosis Victims and the Importance of the Supreme

Worker at a stone crushing factory. Credit: Debdatta Chakraborty, UCL News/Flickr CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Credit: Debdatta Chakraborty, UCL News/Flickr CC BY-NC-ND 2.0 Amulya Nidhi and Ashish Gupta

More

M.C. Mehta Vs. Union of India & Ors Judgments

24/05/1992· No stone crusher shall operate in the Union territory of Delhi from August 15, 1992 onward. (2) The mechanical stone crushers established/operating in Suraj Kund, Lakhanpur, Lakkarpur, Kattan, Gurukul, Badkhal, Pallinangla, Saraikhaja, Anangpur and Ballabgarh areas of Haryana shall stop operating/functioning with effect from August 15, 1992.

More

State Of Uttaranchal vs M/S. Kumaon Stone Crusher on 15

After crushing of the stone boulders, stone grits, stone chips and stone dust are obtained which does not transform into any new commodity, except that the stone in smaller pieces and shapes are obtained. The Allahabad High Court, in its judgment in Kumar Stone Works (Supra) decided on 27.04.2005 has given a detailed reasoning for not accepting stone grits, stone chips and stone dust as a new

More

Supreme Court (SC) Judgements on Minimum Wages

Judgement Date : may/2020, Citation : 2020 Latest Caselaw 380 SC prescribing 477 the minimum rates of wages for employment in stone breaking and stone crushing operations carried on in mines in exercise of the authority delegated to it by the President Read full Judgement . The Bijay Cotton Mills Ltd. Vs. Their Workmen & ANR [1960] INSC 23 (12 February 1960)

More

State of Uttaranchal and Ors Vs. Kumaon Stone Crusher on

Kumaon Stone Crusher (Supreme Court Of India) Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) No. 19445, 24889 Of 2004, 23547 Of 2005, 24106 Of 2007, 21868, 22363 Of 2010, 12318, 12530, 21930 Of 2009, 26825, 18094 Of 2011, C.A. No. 1007 Of 2011, 2047 Of 2006, Slp (C) No. 2294 Of 2008, 11846 Of 2009 And 33180 Of 2010 12-11-2013

More

Crushing (execution) Wikipedia

Death by crushing or pressing is a method of execution that has a history during which the techniques used varied greatly from place to place, generally involving the placement of intense weight upon a person with the intent to kill. This form of execution is no longer used by any government. Crushing by elephant. Louis Rousselet described this Central Indian execution in "Le Tour du Monde" in

More